A shortlist of where AI is worth it
Your workflows ranked by value, risk and how ready the data is, with a note on how much freedom the model should have in each.
AI-first applications
We help you decide what the model should do, what ordinary code should keep doing, and what it takes to turn a demo that impresses into a feature people can rely on.

Does the AI have a clear job, or was it added because it could be?
Which answers need a source, a permission check, an exact calculation or a person to approve them?
After launch, can you tell when it gets something wrong, and can you fix it?
What does the user see when the model is down, unsure or wrong?
Your workflows ranked by value, risk and how ready the data is, with a note on how much freedom the model should have in each.
What it can read, what it must cite, what needs a person to confirm, and what happens when it fails. Written so engineers can build it and managers can sign it off.
The stages, how you will test each one, who owns it once it runs, and what it will cost before you scale it.
Tell us what keeps going wrong. A few rough lines are enough.
We talk it through, then send a short note: what we will look at, how long it should take and what it costs.
We read the system, talk to the people doing the work and follow real cases from start to finish.
A written report in plain language, a plan in order of priority, and a session to walk your team through both.
We build and run our own products. The advice comes from that work.
Memoirs of MidgardA live browser game we built with AI assistance. It taught us that building fast with AI still needs design, review and testing done by people.
Truyền ThuyếtA 69-chapter novel and gamebook written with AI under human direction, with the continuity checks and editing passes we had to design ourselves.You do not need a tidy brief. A few lines about the system, workflow or delivery problem are enough to start.